Fifth International Electronic Conference on Synthetic Organic Chemistry (ECSOC-5), http://www.mdpi.org/ecsoc-5.htm, 1-30 September 2001

[E0019]

Palladium-Catalyzed Coupling of Silyl-Acetylenes to Aryl Halides Using Microwave Irradiation


Ulrik S. Sørensen, Judith Wede, and Esteban Pombo-Villar*

Nervous System Research, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

http://www.mdpi.net/ecsoc-5/e0019/[email protected]


Received: 15 August 2001 / Uploaded 22 August 2001

It has previously been reported that the reaction between 2-iodobenzaldehyde and 1-phenyl-2-(trimethylsilyl)acetylene (3) in the presence of palladium acetate gives the corresponding 2-trimethylsilyl-substituted indenone 2.1 When repeating this experiment, using slightly different reaction conditions and replacing 2-iodobenzaldehyde with 2-bromobenzaldehyde, we did, however, not isolate the above mentioned indenone but rather the cross-coupling product 1 (Scheme 1).

This finding prompted us to study this Sonogashira-type coupling of 1-phenyl-2-(trimethylsilyl)acetylenes to give disubstituted acetylenes. The Sonogashira coupling is well-known as the synthesis of substituted acetylenes by coupling aryl or vinyl halides with terminal acetylenes in the presence of a palladium catalyst and CuI as cocatalyst.2 Numerous reports describe the coupling of trimethylsilylacetylene with aryl halides in Sonogashira type reactions, and the trimethylsilyl (TMS) group is generally unaffected and thus functions as a protecting group which can be subsequently removed to furnish a new terminal alkyne.3

However, in the reaction shown above the coupling product 1 is achieved without previous deprotection of the TMS group of 3. A recent study on the Pd-Cu cocatalyzed cross-coupling of (arylethynyl)trimethylsilanes and aryl halides or triflates concluded that copper was required for this reaction to occur.4 However, the result of our work is a procedure for the coupling of 1-phenyl-2-(trimethysilyl)acetylenes with arylhalides to give 1-aryl-2-phenyl acetylenes without the use of a copper cocatalyst and furthermore with short reaction times by the use of microwave5 (MW) irradiation.

The mechanism for this transformation is not clear, but one could speculate that the reaction proceeds via a transmetallation pathway (Scheme 2). A similar mechanism has recently been argued by Itami et al. to explain the palladium-catalyzed coupling of alkenyl-silanes with aryl- and vinylhalides in the presence of tetrabutylammonium fluoride.6 Fluoride-induced silicon to Pd transmetallation has also been invoked in Pd-catalyzed cross coupling reactions by Hiyama et al.7

When the cross-coupling reaction of 3 and 3-iodopyridine was carried out at room temperature overnight compound 4 was isolated in a moderate 28 % yield (Table 1, entry 10). To reduce the reaction time and improve the yield we increased the reaction temperature by means of MW irradiation. The results of these experiments, aimed at identifying optimized reaction conditions, are shown in Table 1 and gave compound 4 in up to 90 % isolated yield.

For most experiments DMF was used as solvent. Being highly polar, it absorbs microwaves well, resulting in very rapid heating. Using 50 ml of DMF and irradiation at 450 W we observed a temperature increase from room temperature to 100 ºC within approximately 30 seconds. This rapid heating may explain the higher yield obtained using MW as compared to conventional heating. Thus, in an otherwise identical experiment, 4 was isolated in 64 % yield (Table 1, entry 11) when heating on an oil bath as compared to 75 % (Table 1, entry 12) when applying MW. A similar difference, although less marked, was found when starting from 3-bromopyridine (Table 1, entry 2 and 3). 

Among the synthesized compounds is the neuroactive compound 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP, synthesized from 5), a highly potent and selective metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonist.8

As can be seen from both Tables 1 and 2, the addition of tri(o-tolyl)phosphine in most cases resulted in significantly improved yields. This could be caused by a stabilizing effect of this ligand on the reactive palladium species, as previously discussed for e.g. the palladium-catalyzed Heck coupling.9

To broaden the scope of the reaction we are also interested in introducing functionalized substituents. Thus, in a preliminary experiment, using as substrate trimethylacetylene 6, it was possible to introduce the benzaldehyde moiety and obtain the desired coupling product 7 in 60 % yield (Scheme 3).

In summary, we have developed a method for direct coupling of 1-phenyl-2-(trimethylsilyl)-acetylenes with aryl- and heteroarylhalides, to give disubstituted acetylenes without initial TMS deprotection and without the use of a copper cocatalyst.

Example of experimental procedure. Synthesis of 3-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (4). 3-Iodopyridine (2.50 mmol), 3 (5.00 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (0.125 mmol), n-Bu4NCl (2.50 mmol), tri(o-tolyl)phosphine (0.25 mmol), and NaOAc (10.0 mmol) in dry DMF (50 ml) were heated under Ar in the MW oven10 for 15 minutes at 100 °C. After cooling, the reaction mixture was added saturated NaHCO3. Usual work up and silica gel CC (0-10 % EtOAc in hexane) gave 4 as a dark solid (90 %) which was fully characterized by 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, mp, MS (ES+), and HRMS.

* Address correspondence to: [email protected] 1) Larock, R. C.; Doty, M. J.; Cacchi, S. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 4579. 2) a. Sonogashira, K.; Tohda, Y.; Hagihara, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 4467. b. (review) Rossi, R.; Carpita, A.; Bellina, F. Org. Prep. Proc. Int.1995, 27, 127. 3) Takahashi, S.; Kuroyama, Y.; Sonogashira, K.; Hagihara, N. Synthesis 1980, 627. 4) Nishihara, Y.; Ikegashira, K.; Hirabayashi, K.; Ando, J.-i.; Mori, A.; Hiyama, T. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1780. 5) (recent reviews) a. Caddick, S. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 10403. b. Strauss, C. R.; Trainor, R. W. Aust. J. Chem. 1995, 48, 1665. c. Galema, S. A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1997, 26, 233. 6) Itami, K.; Nokami, T.; Yoshida, J.-i. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5600. 7) Hiyama, T.; Hatanaka, Y. Pure Appl. Chem. 1994, 66, 1471, and references cited therein. 8) a. Gasparini, F.; Lingenhöhl, K.; Stoehr, N.; Flor, P. J.; Heinrich, M.; Vranesic, I.; Biollaz, M.; Allgeier, H.; Heckendorn, R.; Urwyler, S.; Varney, M. A.; Johnson, E. C.; Hess, S. D.; Rao, S. P.; Sacaan, A. I.; Santori, E. M.; Veliçelebi, G.; Kuhn, R. Neuropharmacology1999, 38, 1493. b. Salt, T. E.; Binns, K. E.; Turner, J. P.; Gasparini, F.; Kuhn, R. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1999, 127, 1057. 9) Beletskaya, I. P.; Cheprakov, A. V. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 3009. 10) All MW experiments were carried out in a MLS-Ethos 1600 instrument from Milestone except for entry 14 Table 1 which was performed using the PersonalChemistry SmithCreator™.