Todd L. Duncan1 and Jack S. Semura2
1 Center for Science Education, Portland State University,
P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207, USA. Tel. (503) 805-7860;
E-mail: [email protected]
2 Department of Physics, Portland State University,
P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207, USA. Tel. (503) 725-4229;
E-mail: [email protected]
Received: 26 November 2003 / Accepted: 9 January 2004 / Published: 11 March 2004
Abstract: Even after over 150 years of discussion, the interpretation of the second law of thermodynamics continues to be a source of confusion and controversy in physics. This confusion has been accentuated by recent challenges to the second law and by the difficulty in many cases of clarifying which formulation is threatened and how serious the implications of a successful challenge would be. To help bring clarity and consistency to the analysis of these challenges, the aim of this paper is to suggest a simple formulation of the deep physics of the second law, and to point out how such a statement might help us organize the challenges by level of seriousness. We pursue the notion that the second law is ultimately a restriction operating directly on the dynamics of information, so the existence of this law can be traced to the need for a system of "information bookkeeping" that is independent of the bookkeeping for energy. Energy and information are related but independent, so the dynamical restrictions for one cannot be derived from those for the other. From this perspective, we also suggest the possibility that the foundation of the second law may be linked to the finite capacity of nature to store bookkeeping information about its own state.
Keywords: second law; thermodynamics; information; entropy.